Talk:SMS Victoria Louise
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the SMS Victoria Louise article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | SMS Victoria Louise has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
![]() | SMS Victoria Louise is part of the Protected cruisers of Germany series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:SMS Victoria Louise/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Thurgate (talk · contribs) 15:59, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- prose:
(MoS):
- prose:
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Comments
[edit]1. She was named for Princess Victoria Louise. Suggest - She was named after Princess Victoria Louise
- Works for me. Thanks for reviewing the article. Parsecboy (talk) 16:32, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
I've put the article on hold for seven days to allow you to address the issues I've brought up. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, or here with any concerns. Thurgate (talk) 15:59, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
- Passed. Good job Parsec. How many more German warships are their? Thurgate (talk) 16:36, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
- You'd think after 5 years, I'd be slowing down :) There are the rest of the protected cruisers, the light cruisers, the coastal defense ships, and the carriers to finish up, as far as major warships go. Sturmvogel has done a number of the WWII destroyers, which I probably won't ever get to. Parsecboy (talk) 16:43, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
- Passed. Good job Parsec. How many more German warships are their? Thurgate (talk) 16:36, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Warfare good articles
- GA-Class Featured topics articles
- Wikipedia featured topics Protected cruisers of Germany good content
- Low-importance Featured topics articles
- GA-Class Ships articles
- All WikiProject Ships pages
- GA-Class military history articles
- GA-Class maritime warfare articles
- Maritime warfare task force articles
- GA-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- GA-Class German military history articles
- German military history task force articles
- GA-Class World War I articles
- World War I task force articles
- GA-Class Germany articles
- Low-importance Germany articles
- WikiProject Germany articles